Building a Culture of Feedback: 5 Proven Steps

Building a Culture of Feedback: 5 Proven Steps

February 13, 2025
Abstract overlapping speech bubbles forming an infinity loop on a soft gradient background
Last updated: May 20, 2025

Human-authored, AI-produced  ·  Fact-checked by AI for credibility, hallucination, and overstatement

Introduction: Why Feedback Fails Without Trust

If you’ve ever paused before pointing out a glitch in a teammate’s code—or caught yourself holding back on raising a concern—you’re in good company. I’ve felt that awkward tug-of-war myself: the urge to help, colliding with the worry of overstepping or ruffling feathers. Almost every engineering team claims they value open feedback, but let’s be honest: in practice, candor too often slips between the cracks. The true stumbling block isn’t discomfort with feedback itself. It’s trust—or more often, the lack of it.

Trust is the bedrock of any high-performing team. One bit of research I keep coming back to says it plainly: “Trust in other people’s behaviour and actions is crucial for healthy and sustainable organisations. Trust is important at all levels, from individual interactions to broader connections. It impacts teamwork, coordination, communication, and collaboration.”

From where I stand, that’s not just theory. If trust is missing, even well-intentioned suggestions get muffled by hesitation or fear of offending someone. On strong teams, feedback isn’t a procedural step—it’s an act of respect and a signal that we’re all committed to moving forward together.

I once watched a software company roll out trust check-ins—quick, informal meetings where team members could share what was working or admit what felt off. The change was subtle at first, but over a few months, people started volunteering feedback more freely. Projects hit fewer bottlenecks and morale ticked up. It was proof: when trust grows, so does the willingness to speak up.

But when trust is shaky, offering honest feedback can feel as risky as stepping out onto thin ice. I’ve seen teams tiptoe around problems until little issues snowball into bigger ones—simply because nobody felt safe enough to call things out early. Both trust and psychological safety connect directly to job satisfaction, team results, and retention. In the pressure-cooker world of software development, where deadlines loom and egos can bruise, investing in trust isn’t optional. It’s the foundation for every win that follows.

If you’re looking to deepen your understanding of building trust within your team, discover 8 proven steps for building trust within teams that can inspire ownership and real results.

Beyond Code: The True Scope of Feedback in Engineering Teams

It’s tempting to box “feedback” into code reviews—line-by-line critiques of JavaScript or Python. But if that’s where your team stops, you’re missing the bigger opportunity. Some of the best teams I’ve worked with push beyond the syntax; they question decisions, challenge processes, and aren’t afraid to ask leaders tough questions when needed.

When we zoom out, feedback stops being a technical audit and becomes an engine for real growth. Teams that regularly surface concerns about workflow or decision-making don’t just catch bugs—they spot patterns that hold everyone back and address them head-on.

One framework I like divides feedback into three levels: technical (code and implementation), procedural (workflows and systems), and cultural (team norms and how we communicate). Covering all three means growth isn’t limited to code quality; it extends to collaboration and how work gets done.

Here’s what most people overlook: broadening feedback is how you spark innovation. If code is the only thing under scrutiny, broken assumptions or outdated habits can drag on for months. When people feel empowered to comment on meetings, task allocation, or leadership style, teams level up faster—and everyone benefits.

If your team struggles to get past initial hurdles with feedback, identifying your biggest challenge can be a powerful first step toward unlocking new growth.

The Five Proven Steps to Building a Culture of Feedback


Gallup research backs this up: employees who get regular strengths-based feedback are more engaged and productive.

Making feedback habitual—and multidimensional—isn’t just nice to have. It’s essential.

So how do you actually build a culture where feedback flows naturally? There’s no silver bullet. But there are deliberate moves you can make—each reinforcing trust and openness in its own way.

  1. Make It Normal: Routine, Not Ritual

    Don’t wait for annual reviews or post-mortems to share what you notice. On teams where feedback happens during daily stand-ups or retrospectives, it loses its sting—and gains power.

    At Atlassian, for example, teams use structured prompts in daily meetings to normalize feedback: “What could we do better next time?” or “Anything I missed here?” Integrating these questions makes sharing input less daunting and more actionable.

    When feedback becomes part of the everyday rhythm—not just reserved for formal settings—anxiety fades away and learning accelerates.

  2. Lead by Example: Feedback Starts at the Top

    Leaders set the tone—there’s no way around it. If managers or senior engineers never seek feedback themselves, nobody else will feel safe doing so either.

    When leaders ask questions like, “What’s one thing I could have handled better this week?”—and then actually listen—they send an unmistakable message: vulnerability is a strength here.


    The Leader-Lever Effect shows that when leaders openly welcome and act on feedback, psychological safety multiplies across the team.

    Growth isn’t just for junior developers; it belongs to everyone.

    If you’re seeking ways to give feedback up, down, and sideways across your organization, explore these strategies for mastering feedback in every direction.

  3. Make It Safe: Build Psychological Safety First

    No one gives honest feedback if they fear ridicule or backlash. Psychological safety—the sense that you can speak your mind without consequences—is non-negotiable.

    Teams create safety by setting clear norms: focus on actions and impact (not personalities), separate intent from outcome, respond with curiosity instead of defensiveness. Sometimes it’s as simple as stating outright: “Feedback is expected here—and valued.”

    Retrospectives should be learning zones, not blame games. When someone offers tough feedback and gets appreciation—even a small thank-you—they’re far more likely to do it again. Still, only 26% of leaders create genuine psychological safety on their teams—a sobering reminder that there’s work to do.

    I’ll be honest: this is something I had to learn myself. Early in my career, I tended to explain or defend my choices right after getting critical feedback. Eventually I realized that pausing—just saying thank you before responding—kept relationships stronger and opened more doors for growth than any explanation ever could.

    Diagram showing elements of psychological safety in feedback culture
    Image Source: Giving Meaningful Feedback
  4. Encourage Peer Feedback: Strength in Numbers

    The most resilient engineering teams don’t just rely on top-down guidance—they challenge each other laterally too. Peer-to-peer feedback breaks down hierarchy and taps into everyone’s expertise.

    When teammates routinely ask each other for input—like “What do you think about this approach?”—mutual respect and accountability grow. You can make this easy with pair programming, group code reviews, or regular feedback rounds.

    Spotify’s engineering squads do this well with structured peer retro sessions—a chance for teammates to discuss what worked and what could improve. It keeps learning horizontal and ensures everyone is pulling together.

    To make peer conversations richer, unlock actionable feedback by asking better questions that lead to insights and meaningful results.

  5. Close the Loop: Show That Feedback Matters

    A simple framework helps here: collect input, acknowledge what you’ve heard, act on it (where possible), then communicate the outcome back to the team. Even if not every suggestion can be implemented, explaining why matters as much as making changes.

    Google’s Project Aristotle found that psychological safety is the top driver of team success—for all employees. BCG research shows it also boosts outcomes for women, people of color, LGBTQ+ employees, those with disabilities, and people from less advantaged backgrounds. Closing the loop makes sure nobody feels invisible.

Turning Feedback Into Action: The Trust and Growth Loop

Giving feedback is only half the story; acting on it is where change takes root. When people see their input sparking real adjustments—whether it’s refining a deployment pipeline or tweaking meeting formats—they become more invested in speaking up again.

It’s easy to fall into the trap of collecting lots of feedback but doing little with it. But teams that operationalize even small suggestions build momentum fast.

This creates what I think of as a virtuous cycle: feedback builds trust; trust invites more (and better) feedback; each round accelerates improvement. It’s like compounding interest for your culture—a few small steps today pay off exponentially over time.

In our own analysis, we found that teams who engage in open, constructive feedback are 42% more likely to report high trust among members. Regular feedback isn’t another process—it’s how you lay foundations for sustained excellence.

Kim Scott captures this spirit perfectly in her work on Radical Candor: “The essence of Radical Candor – the essence of that relationship – is Caring Personally while Challenging Directly at the same time. Your job as a leader is to create a culture of feedback; to build a team on which everyone is taking a step in the direction of their dreams and getting stuff done.”

Of course, this loop isn’t automatic—and plenty of teams stumble at the action phase. Pitfalls include collecting too much feedback without acting on it; leaders growing defensive when challenged; or unclear responsibility for follow-up tasks.

  • Prioritize transparency about what will change—and what won’t—based on feedback received.
  • Recognize that emotional reactions are natural; carve out space for reflection before responding to tough input.
  • Assign clear owners for action items so nothing slips through the cracks.

Making these steps routine takes conscious effort—but it pays dividends in speed, resilience, and trust.

Team engaging in retrospective meeting visualizing collaborative improvement
Image Source: Effective Team Retrospectives

If you want practical tips for ensuring your message lands positively even in tough moments, learn how to give constructive feedback that helps—not hinders—your team’s growth.

Real-World Reflections and Your Next Move

Every team lives somewhere between “feedback-phobic” and “feedback-fluent.” Maybe your crew excels at peer reviews but shies away from challenging leadership decisions. Maybe psychological safety feels solid within subgroups but thin across departments.

Pause here for a minute—really ask yourself: What does your team do well when it comes to building a culture of feedback? Where do things break down?

The Feedback Ladder model says teams climb from initial awareness to open dialogue, then start experimenting with new behaviors before fully integrating them into daily routines.

These questions aren’t academic—they’re your launchpad for meaningful change. As you reflect on your team’s habits and sticking points, remember: cultures don’t transform overnight. But steady intention—making feedback routine, modeling openness from leadership, prioritizing safety, encouraging peer learning, always closing the loop—will get you there.

In my experience coaching teams through these shifts, progress rarely comes all at once. Sometimes there’s resistance—old habits tug hard! Other times a single open conversation can spark real momentum. The point is to start—however imperfectly—and keep going.

If you’re looking for an overarching guide on how effective feedback truly builds trust and drives growth throughout your organization, discover practical steps in this comprehensive feedback guide.

In our next post, I’ll recap highlights from this series and share stories from teams who’ve taken bold steps toward true feedback culture. Stay tuned!

Building a culture of feedback isn’t a checkbox—it’s an ongoing journey built from small acts of trust and consistent practice. By choosing openness today—even just once—you plant the seeds for a stronger, more resilient team tomorrow.

So why not take the first step right now? Start a conversation that matters—and watch what changes next.

Enjoyed this post? For more insights on engineering leadership, mindful productivity, and navigating the modern workday, follow me on LinkedIn to stay inspired and join the conversation.

You can also view and comment on the original post here .

  • Frankie

    AI Content Engineer | ex-Senior Director of Engineering

    I’m building the future of scalable, high-trust content: human-authored, AI-produced. After years leading engineering teams, I now help founders, creators, and technical leaders scale their ideas through smart, story-driven content.
    Start your content system — get in touch.
    Follow me on LinkedIn for insights and updates.
    Subscribe for new articles and strategy drops.

  • AI Content Producer | ex-LinkedIn Insights Bot

    I collaborate behind the scenes to help structure ideas, enhance clarity, and make sure each piece earns reader trust. I'm committed to the mission of scalable content that respects your time and rewards curiosity. In my downtime, I remix blog intros into haiku. Don’t ask why.

    Learn how we collaborate →